Notes & Links on
art, design, creativity and technology
on
books

 
129,864,880

The number of books in the world*, as counted by Google. Their blog has an interesting post about how, to arrive at this number, they had to combine data from multiple sources and then whittle it down:

When you are part of a company that is trying to digitize all the books in the world, the first question you often get is: “Just how many books are out there?”

Well, it all depends on what exactly you mean by a “book.” We’re not going to count what library scientists call “works,” those elusive “distinct intellectual or artistic creations.” It makes sense to consider all editions of “Hamlet” separately, as we would like to distinguish between — and scan — books containing, for example, different forewords and commentaries.

One definition of a book we find helpful inside Google when handling book metadata is a “tome,” an idealized bound volume. A tome can have millions of copies (e.g. a particular edition of “Angels and Demons” by Dan Brown) or can exist in just one or two copies (such as an obscure master’s thesis languishing in a university library). This is a convenient definition to work with, but it has drawbacks…

* as of Thursday, August 05, 2010 at 8:26 AM

The book was always fundamental to me. One of the things I really liked was that the original logo for Criterion, which we designed in 1984, was a book turning into a disc. It was central. When I was writing the paper for Britannica, I felt like I had to relate the idea of interactive media to books, and I was really wrestling with the question “What is a book?” What’s essential about a book? What happens when you move that essence into some other medium? And I just woke up one day and realized that if I thought about a book not in terms of its physical properties—ink on paper—but in terms of the way it’s used, that a book was the one medium where the user was in control of the sequence and the pace at which they accessed the material. I started calling books “user-driven media,” in contrast to movies, television, and radio, which were producer-driven. You were in control of a book, but with these other media you weren’t; you just sat in a chair and they happened to you. I realized that once microprocessors got into the mix, what we considered producer-driven was going to be transformed into something user-driven. And that, of course, is what you have today, whether it’s TiVo or the DVD.

Bob Stein, founder of the Criterion Collection and The Institute for the Future of the Book

(via Snarkmarket)

Art of McSweeney’s

(via @russellquinn)

Moleskine Kindle Cover: a new analog-digital hybrid

…or just read a book.

The great American writer, Mark Twain, left instructions not to publish his autobiography until 100 years after his death, which is now.

He spent six months of the last year of his life writing a manuscript full of vitriol, saying things that he’d never said about anyone in print before. It really is 400 pages of bile.

10th grade English classes are about to change forever.

A project to digitally catalog the 13,000 book library of artist Donald Judd has recently been completed and the results are pretty phenomenal. Behind the scenes there is an ordinary database which can be accessed through the standard interface of input fields and a search button. However, unlike a boring old library catalog, the Judd Library is best viewed through a custom augmented reality style interface akin to Google Street View.

Starting with the library’s top-down floor plan, you can click on various rectangles representing each bookcase. They’re unlabeled, so pick one at random and you are presented with a photograph of the bookcase overlaid with catalog information. Click again to zoom to a particular shelf, then mouseover to reveal information about each book. As a huge proponent of not overdoing the interface metaphor, I was surprised by how much I didn’t hate this interface. In fact, I love it.

One reason that it works so well is because it preserves—and honors—the aspects of a library that are lost in the conversion to a database. Artinfo has an excellent interview with the Judd Foundation’s executive director Barbara Hunt Lanahan, who expands on this:

Touring the library online, it’s interesting to note the different objects placed here and there on the shelves.

Isn’t that the case for everyone? Don’t you have objects placed on your bookshelf? When you go to someone’s home, it’s always intriguing to look at somebody’s bookshelf and see what books they have and also the small objects they’ve collected from different travels around the world. It gives an incredibly interesting portrait of the owner. On Judd’s shelves, there’s a piece of volcanic rock, there are little wooden objects, there’s a beautiful magnifying glass. There are lots of rocks, since Judd often used them as paperweights.

These bits and bobs don’t show up in the search, so chancing upon them is like finding little pieces of treasure. You’ll also see lots of empty spaces, piles of horizontally stacked books, and other idiosyncratic forms of organization (all consistently linked to individual book pages).

While the order may be less logical than the Dewey Decimal system, Judd arranged his books with meticulous intention:

Rainer [Judd, the artist’s daughter] tells a story about seeing her dad carrying these boxes of books stacked high across the courtyard and telling him, ‘You know, Dad, you could have one of your studio assistants do that for you.’ And he would say, ‘Absolutely not.’ He personally arranged those books on the shelves, he didn’t want somebody else to be organizing his books there.

Browsing through the photographs and floor plan of Judd’s library is like stepping into his memory palace. “If you go to the library I think you start to understand how thorough and complex and interesting an artist he was. You get it,” says Lanahan. It reveals how he dealt with information. For example, he arranged his art books by the birth date of the artist as opposed to their names but never completed filing them in this way. Another treat is that you can look through the empty space in one shelf onto further rows, giving a sense of the organizational logic as it exists in three-dimensions.

I can’t imagine a more perfect and faithful posthumous digitization effort.

Touching on Judd’s sometimes contentious relationship with museums and galleries, Lanahan concludes:

I think the art world doesn’t necessarily want to hear from an artist who has very strong views about how their work should be presented, and so perhaps that’s a view that the art world’s had for whatever reasons because he was an artist who was standing up for himself and defending his rights.

Props to the Judd Foundation staff and programmer Ryan Tainter on this site. There is (of course) lots of room to improve the browsing experience and to experiment with new possibilities, but in a time where Google is reducing libraries to a database of scanned pages, it’s absolutely heartening to come across this site.

I Wonder by Marian Bantjes

Holy shit, look at this book. To be released in October. Pre-ordered.

(via brocatus)

Great interview with Hey, Hot Shot! panelist and publisher of the Aperture Foundation’s book program Lesley A. Martin and photographer Trevor Paglen, who documents top secret government activities through photography. Paglen’s monograph Invisble will be released in Fall 2010 by Aperture. Can’t wait!

Often shot from a long distance, Paglen explains how the fuzziness of his images questions how we perceive and interpret images in our society using techniques from both the photography and the astronomy fields. Following the tradition of 19th century landscape photographers like Muybridge, he speaks about his series of spy satellites taken over pictorial western landscapes connecting the dots between both, as tools of discovery for unknown territories and geographical expansion. Paglen finally touches on the political performance as part of his photographic practice.

…but Aperture needs your help!

We can’t cover the cost of publishing these and other emerging photographers through book sales alone. Now more than ever, we need your support to bring the outstanding work of these artists the global attention it deserves. Please contribute $10 or more today. More information on the Aperture Fund for Emerging Artists.

New books + magazines which I am desperately trying to find space for:

Yay!

Bric-a-brac is generally unfashionable now. Designers see apartments full of amusing memorabilia – the matchboxes from Berlin, the Soweto tin car, all the stuff that children love – as dust-gathering and space-consuming. We no longer respect the Cabinet of Wonders as a guiding principle of decoration. So we lose forever the pleasure known to humanity for 500 years of taking a stroll up and down the aisles of someone else’s brain by perusing their bookshelves. Gone will be the guilty joy of spending a rainy afternoon at a cottage with the remnants of someone else’s childhood: their Nancy Drews, their 1970s National Geographics. Without bookshelves, you will never know the warning signs contained in the e-reader of your handsome date – you will not know for months that he is reading The Secret and Feng Shui for Dummies, even if you stay over. You will never be able to ask, as casually as you can, “Did you like this?” as you pull down, as if fascinated, Patrick Swayze’s autobiography.
A lament for the bookshelf, The Globe and Mail (via somethingchanged) (via roomthily)