Showing only Notes & Links tagged organization on art, design, creativity and, technology

Contact Me

hello@caseyagollan.com
@caseyg on Twitter

 

A project to digitally catalog the 13,000 book library of artist Donald Judd has recently been completed and the results are pretty phenomenal. Behind the scenes there is an ordinary database which can be accessed through the standard interface of input fields and a search button. However, unlike a boring old library catalog, the Judd Library is best viewed through a custom augmented reality style interface akin to Google Street View.

Starting with the library’s top-down floor plan, you can click on various rectangles representing each bookcase. They’re unlabeled, so pick one at random and you are presented with a photograph of the bookcase overlaid with catalog information. Click again to zoom to a particular shelf, then mouseover to reveal information about each book. As a huge proponent of not overdoing the interface metaphor, I was surprised by how much I didn’t hate this interface. In fact, I love it.

One reason that it works so well is because it preserves—and honors—the aspects of a library that are lost in the conversion to a database. Artinfo has an excellent interview with the Judd Foundation’s executive director Barbara Hunt Lanahan, who expands on this:

Touring the library online, it’s interesting to note the different objects placed here and there on the shelves.

Isn’t that the case for everyone? Don’t you have objects placed on your bookshelf? When you go to someone’s home, it’s always intriguing to look at somebody’s bookshelf and see what books they have and also the small objects they’ve collected from different travels around the world. It gives an incredibly interesting portrait of the owner. On Judd’s shelves, there’s a piece of volcanic rock, there are little wooden objects, there’s a beautiful magnifying glass. There are lots of rocks, since Judd often used them as paperweights.

These bits and bobs don’t show up in the search, so chancing upon them is like finding little pieces of treasure. You’ll also see lots of empty spaces, piles of horizontally stacked books, and other idiosyncratic forms of organization (all consistently linked to individual book pages).

While the order may be less logical than the Dewey Decimal system, Judd arranged his books with meticulous intention:

Rainer [Judd, the artist’s daughter] tells a story about seeing her dad carrying these boxes of books stacked high across the courtyard and telling him, ‘You know, Dad, you could have one of your studio assistants do that for you.’ And he would say, ‘Absolutely not.’ He personally arranged those books on the shelves, he didn’t want somebody else to be organizing his books there.

Browsing through the photographs and floor plan of Judd’s library is like stepping into his memory palace. “If you go to the library I think you start to understand how thorough and complex and interesting an artist he was. You get it,” says Lanahan. It reveals how he dealt with information. For example, he arranged his art books by the birth date of the artist as opposed to their names but never completed filing them in this way. Another treat is that you can look through the empty space in one shelf onto further rows, giving a sense of the organizational logic as it exists in three-dimensions.

I can’t imagine a more perfect and faithful posthumous digitization effort.

Touching on Judd’s sometimes contentious relationship with museums and galleries, Lanahan concludes:

I think the art world doesn’t necessarily want to hear from an artist who has very strong views about how their work should be presented, and so perhaps that’s a view that the art world’s had for whatever reasons because he was an artist who was standing up for himself and defending his rights.

Props to the Judd Foundation staff and programmer Ryan Tainter on this site. There is (of course) lots of room to improve the browsing experience and to experiment with new possibilities, but in a time where Google is reducing libraries to a database of scanned pages, it’s absolutely heartening to come across this site.

Lisa Courtney has the Biggest Pokemon Memorabilia Collection in the world, with 12,113 items, according to the Guinness Book of World Records. More record setters on The Big Picture. (via Kottke)

YOU KILLED MY MOTHER CHOIRE. JUST LIKE THE INTERNET KILLED PUBLISHING.

A Conversation with Paul Ford, Web Editor of Harper’s Magazine | The Awl

All kidding aside—and there is a lot of kidding—this hilarious conversation between Chore Sicha and Paul Ford, (who has proven himself to be one of the brightest minds in online publishing, and whose taxonomized website Ftrain.com has been blowing my mind since a very long time ago) is really intelligent, interesting, and ridiculously fun to read.

Last week at 20x200 HQ I had a really interesting conversation with David about how people react to and share things on the web (new retweets vs old retweets, liking vs favoriting, rating by stars vs emotions, etc). That discussion led to talking about redundancy (e.g. reblogs, old reweets, where content gets copied over and over) and then to the general merits of having structured data.

When using blog oriented content management systems like Movable Type, a lot of repetitious information gets inputted in a non-systematic way. E.g. coding a link to a pop-up image into a text field, rather than uploading the image into a field designed for that specific type of image and having the system take care of the rest in a standardized way. The problem is that it’s not just difficult to write a custom CMS that covers all your needs, but also to find out what your needs are, anticipate future needs (lots of my job at 20x200 involves going back in time and filling in blanks or adapting unstructured data into the logical new system), and create a system that strikes a balance between total lack of structure and too-rigid-to-function. I half-joked that every single person should be required to write their own CMS.

I think some of the most compelling web content today is “bespoke” meaning it breaks out of the boring “text and images slopped into a pre-packaged template” and features posts which are still organized in a linear way, but designed individually with respect to the content. This seems to break away from rigid/templated/database-centric design, but I find that Ford’s Ftrain.com and Harpers.org, which don’t have custom designs for every single page, are equally—if not moreso—compelling. They evoke a sense of bespoke-ness not through a decorative custom design for each page, but through a handcrafted and thoughtfully considered taxonomy of their contents.

This is all a roundabout way of getting around to saying that Ftrain.com was the first time I realized that though one CMS may fit all, the magic really happens when an author takes publishing tools into their own hands. After experiencing Ftrain, I promptly went out and bought a book on XSLT, which I never read and am still too intimidated to tackle. I don’t even know if it’s still a relevant technology, but the point is that years later the idea is still not out of my head!

Paul Ford on the hierarchy of Ftrain.com:

Many people come back to Ftrain over a course of months of years before the structure makes sense, and then, they tell me, it suddenly makes perfect sense. The structure is an essential part of the site. So if you like the writing, but are put off by the structure, know that other people have felt your pain, but that sticking with it might reward you. Might.

Ftrain is a hierarchy. Any given page has one or more of parent, children, and sibling pages, and every page lives somewhere in the hierarchy.

The front page is the very top node of the hierarchy, and everything branches out from there.

On the front page are all the pages flagged for release on this day, or, if there are none, the most recent piece written.

If you use Mozilla, a recent Netscape, or Opera the wonderful “Site Navigation Bar” feature will also allow you to quickly race around Ftrain’s hierarchy.

You can also navigate chronologically, by following the “Navigate by Time” links at the bottom of the page.

Ftrain is this complicated because it has over 1000 separate nodes, all of them connected to one another in some way, with something like 700,000 words between them, and all extensible. It was designed to make it possible to tell stories over time, so that a piece begun in one year could be resolved in the next, just like it happens in life, but with the added satisfaction of narrative completion.

I think the navigation is an okay, but imperfect compromise between the technical and the prosaic, and will continue to develop it.

Time and time again I am hit with pangs of guilt when dashing off notes + links containing words like “bespoke” and “carefully considered” to my off-the-shelf solution that is Tumblr, but they have truly created a set of tools that make it sufficiently stylish and effortless to capture ideas. I have ideas for some changed or additional features for interacting with my specific type of content which extend beyond the scope of Tumblr, but who has the time or knowledge to code these dreams into existence?

Me? I’m not saying yes and I’m not saying no. But it’s a good reminder that it’s time to brush up on my programming.

reference from sorted books - nina katchadourian
c-prints, each 12.5 x 19 inches, 1993

(via jennilee)

composition from sorted books - nina katchadourian
c-prints, each 12.5 x 19 inches, 1993

Have I mentioned that I love Nina Katchadourian?

(via jennilee)

Core-Toons: MindMapping - Core77

Grid by Julie Harris

The grid may be used as a form of categorization and organization. This graph is a form of the grid that prioritizes various actions, placing them by strength of wants and needs.

Julie made this and it’s awesome.

Creating a good blog is like hiding your treasure under piles of new treasure. Creating a bad blog is like burying your trash under piles of new trash. I try to walk a fine line around here.

CursiveBuildings

(via dailymeh)

Color Correcting - today and tomorrow

Color Correcting is a 9 hours long film by Lernert Engelberts and Sander Plug. It shows you how they color corrected 1kg of discodip during the course of an average working day.

Hierarchy is reinforced by exclusion; teamwork is reinforced by inclusion.
John Maeda