Notes & Links on
art, design, creativity and technology
on
the internet

 
It happens that I have strong feelings about the use of [sic]. Hackish writers deploy this routinely to make whoever they are quoting look stupid. It’s a very cheap move, and a sure sign, in my view, of third-tier writing. It’s acceptable to use [sic] if there’s no way around it, and it’s sometimes excusable to use it if you’re trying to underscore the sloppiness, or stupidity, or whatever, of some powerful figure — if the president of an Ivy League school made a glaring mistake in some official context, maybe that would get a pass. But in general, [sic] is a cheap move — we all make mistakes, typos, little glitches, that mean nothing. This web site is full of such errors — for all I know this post will contain such errors, because I’m writing it quickly, and I don’t have a proofreader, etc. In other words, I’m no different than the person I quoted making some workaday, meaningless error.

Rob Walker, My [sic] mistake

(via jenbee)

The future of the internet goes to whosoever is able to make all of this information work for the benefit of people out there who have all types of issues and are trying to find things. People who are standing out there on the corner of 44th st and 5th ave and it’s their mother’s birthday in two weeks and they know it, and their computer knows it and their addresses, and also knows that their tastes are such that there are three scarves that are actually in the inventory at Saks Fifth Avenue and if she just walks up five blocks, she can get that for her. If you are able to solve problems for people that will be immensely useful for people.
Caterina Fake, in an interview with Wired
The alchemy of good curating amounts to this: sometimes placing one work of art near another makes one and one equal three. Two artworks arranged alchemically leave each intact, transform both and create a third thing. This third thing and the two original things then trigger cascades of thought and reaction; you know things you didn’t know you needed to know until you know them; then you can’t imagine ever not knowing them again. Then these things transform all the other things and thoughts you’ve had. This chain-reaction is thrilling and uncanny.

Jerry Saltz, The Alchemy of Curating

Found in Between the Click and the Curator, an epic stringing-things-together style post by Erin Kissane (that is but part two of five in a series).

Erin writes:

Alchemy is such a great figure for this process: it walks and quacks like a science, but at the core, it’s all correspondences and symbolic resonance and story.

That’s a piece of what one sort of curatorial work aspires to achieve. And if you ask me, it’s what we should hang over our desks as well, whether we call ourselves curators or bloggers or editors or tropical penguins. Whether the frisson is emotional or intellectual, if we’re not making the hair stand up on their arms in a flash of recognition, we have work to do.

Also not to be missed are the post’s extra paths, references, and footnotes, which have taken care of my Instapaper reading for the next week.

How much does an artist’s chosen font tell you?

(via hydeordie, sympathyfortheartgallery)

Coatney said Newsweek’s Tumblr (which now has more than 11,000 followers) grew in popularity when he stopped simply pulling in RSS feeds and started to hand-select content for it. When he posted some content from Newsweek.com and some from a variety of other sites, the Tumblr seemed less promotional and more personal. And in doing so, he let people know that there’s a person behind the account.

“I think the common mistake is to treat Tumblr solely as a promotional vehicle to get people back to your site,” said Coatney, who used the Newsweek Tumblr to respond to criticism about the magazine.

Mallary Jean Tenore (via soupsoup, lapuravidagallery)

Modern Day Ideograms

A post on Core77 half-jokingly posits that in 5000 years, archaeologists will dig up tacky shower curtains decorated with emoticons and interpret them as modern day hieroglyphics.

It had never occurred to me how these two languages, separated by an unimaginably vast expanse of time, seem not-so-far removed from each other.

Also, An Xiao observes a few charts and graphs on an office whiteboard that resemble the Chinese characters for “field” and “life.” Citing a link on how drastically Chinese characters have changed over the years, she writes, “What would modern pictographs look like? Something like the [below], I suspect - inspired by PowerPoint and graphs, rather than images from nature.”

The internet is made of people. People matter. This includes you. Stop trying to sell everything about yourself to everyone. Don’t just hammer away and repeat and talk at people—talk TO people. It’s organic. Make stuff for the internet that matters to you, even if it seems stupid. Do it because it’s good and feels important. Put up more cat pictures. Make more songs. Show your doodles. Give things away and take things that are free. Look at what other people are doing, not to compete, imitate, or compare … but because you enjoy looking at the things other people make. Don’t shove yourself into that tiny, airless box called a brand—tiny, airless boxes are for trinkets and dead people.
Maureen Johnson

Phil Gyford creates Today’s Guardian, a site that scrapes together the newspaper’s pages into something designed explicitly for screen reading: ‘Finally, I wanted finishability. I wanted to be able to read today’s news, know I’d read it all, and that I’m done until tomorrow.’

Wonderful.

(via things magazine)

Soon enough, Assange must confront the paradox of his creation: the thing that he seems to detest most—power without accountability—is encoded in the site’s DNA, and will only become more pronounced as WikiLeaks evolves into a real institution.

Raffi Khatchadourian, No Secrets: Julian Assange’s mission for total transparency from The New Yorker

Great article about WikiLeaks!

Never before has the technological, mobile experience of a continuous Now been so crucial in determining the identity and the zeitgeist of a time that seems to exist beyond Time. And so instead of calling it Altermodernity or Atemporaldernity, I have thought of calling it Nowdernity.

Our sensorial experience of time and space is shifting due to a feeling of increased mobility and the technological sensation of an always on that takes connection everywhere: it’s always now, it’s always here.

Renata Lemos, Nowdernity

(Thanks Raul)